With 12 months in a year, it can be quite difficult not to step on toes. There are dozens if not hundreds of development studios now. This year is off to a wild start with quality titles. But of course, it gets very difficult with so many studios people only have so much money and if everyone is putting out games of similar quality, in practice, someone is going to get overlooked, especially if we look at the release windows. If you take the industry as it is, it's true some of the time: games with different budgets have different profitability thresholds. If they wanted to they could have made it a single one but why would you when they know they can release it a bunch of times and make 3 times as many sales Edit: they padded the story that's why it isn't in a single game. Also practically every big dev fired workers this isn't a sustainability problem this goes back to dev companies only focusing on instant cash for shareholders and being greedy companies like I said. Also Sony very rarely makes jrpgs its not their style. I've yet to play a Sony game with a bunch of mini games. But even then sony doesn't make games like ff7 rebirth anyway. They used next to no brain power when it came to critical thinking and this article. Do you understand that? Basically polygon used the most hyped game of the month and tried to force a circle block in a square recess. Ff7 rebirth has shrinking margins for Square Enix ergo Sony has no margins because they paid square enix a set amount on exclusivity. Let's not even get into all the merchandising. First ill pretend that ff7 has shrinking margins for companies even though they are priced more and have dlc. Also your original comment was about dementia, nowhere does this article or any study show there is any truth to that at ALL, so my point about disinformation stands, your just throwing people into fear and/or guilt based on nothing but assumptions. it's the same in all these studies go read them for yourself instead of throwing them around from a biased journalistic site that makes something seem like it was proven when in fact, it was not. Behavioral addictions form a largely unexplored field of study.' There's your answer, sample bias, not enough research etc. Common problems include: sample bias, the search for diagnostic instrumentals, opposing approximations to the matter, and the fact that this entity may be encompassed inside a greater pathology (i.e., sex addiction) that may present itself with very diverse symptomatology. However, despite all efforts, we are still unable to profile when engaging in this behavior becomes pathological. Then when you look at the actual study it says 'In the last few years, there has been a wave of articles related to behavioral addictions some of them have a focus on online pornography addiction. Dunno why I can't reply to your other reply below mine but the article you posted proposes harsh statements that the studies that it links to do not back up at ALL, have you checked any of these studies instead of just blindly accepting them cause they fit your perspective? For example, the article states that porn can cause hypofrontality, damage to the prefrontal cortex in adulthood is termed hypofrontality, which predisposes an individual to behave compulsively and make poor decisions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |